Another thing - "22Mb legacy turd" is not a technical argument (at least, I don't recognize it as one).
I'm disappointed. If there are concerns with maintenance, what are they? I believe there are currently only 3 outstanding Jira entries for the console. Right? It's old - so what, it's not older than ActiveMQ ;-). I love that so many people are passionate about ActiveMQ. I wish that passion were being put into making it better and moving it forward rather than making arguments without merit and laying out criticism - very disappointing. So, back to defining the problem. All I've seen so far is the list of security concerns from Hiram - thank you Hiram. Anything else? I do believe I've read comments about difficulty maintaining it. Is that true, or just an exaggerated expression of frustration? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Console-let-s-get-the-problem-defined-tp4677105p4677224.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
