On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:10 AM, James Strachan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1 February 2014 21:27, artnaseef <[email protected]> wrote: > >> James Strachan-2 wrote >>> The web console is the same old crap >>> it's always been. I wrote quite a bit of it many years ago; I apologise >>> for >>> it profusely- but it still deserves a sympathetic burial. >> >> Why does it deserve a burial? If it's old and unmaintained, then why is it >> a pain point? > > > Its a big security risk, Not really any more than any other console. > its a lousy console, it makes the project look bad Your opinion. It works for what it’s intended to do. It’s simple and easy to use. > and noone wants to maintain it any more - There are people trying to contribute and move it forward. Vote them in and this problem is completely solved! This is a great way to get people more involved with ActiveMQ and get more committers on the project. > and it uses up a huge amount of > space in RAM and in the distro. I would hardly call 1MB a “huge amount”. I guess consider it 5MB with the JSP libraries which wouldn’t be needed otherwise. Dan > > > >> As I've mentioned before, I've used it and still use it, and >> see people posting statements that they are using it too. >> > > Thats fine - as a separate project folks can still include it in distros > and use it. > > -- > James > ------- > Red Hat > > Email: [email protected] > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews > Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
