On 01/31/2014 04:09 PM, artnaseef wrote:
Another thing - "22Mb legacy turd" is not a technical argument (at least, I
don't recognize it as one).
I'm disappointed.
If there are concerns with maintenance, what are they? I believe there are
currently only 3 outstanding Jira entries for the console. Right? It's old
- so what, it's not older than ActiveMQ ;-).
I love that so many people are passionate about ActiveMQ. I wish that
passion were being put into making it better and moving it forward rather
than making arguments without merit and laying out criticism - very
disappointing.
So, back to defining the problem. All I've seen so far is the list of
security concerns from Hiram - thank you Hiram. Anything else? I do
believe I've read comments about difficulty maintaining it. Is that true,
or just an exaggerated expression of frustration?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Console-let-s-get-the-problem-defined-tp4677105p4677224.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Here's some of the issues around the console:
Open
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2785
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2471
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2429
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3555
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4813
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4828
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4994
Closed when we thought the console was deprecated
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4173
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4174
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3370
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4175
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3132
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4499
--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
[email protected] | www.fusesource.com | www.redhat.com
skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
