Hmm, what is "RESOLVED -- LATER"?  Sounds like a way to forget about a
ticket:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4277

If this has not been fixed and the intent is to look at it "later",
shouldn't it be re-opened and not marked as "resolved in 5.10"?




--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-0-Release-Candidate-2-tp4681721p4681857.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to