I didn't really get an answer to my earlier post regarding AMQ-5174. Can that be included in ActiveMQ 5.10 too?
Thanks, Paul On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]> wrote: > I reopened the issue and mark it for 5.11. I don’t think this issue is a > blocker for this release. Having said that, the vote was open for 5 days > with not -1s, so I’ll close it now and continue with the release. > > Regards > -- > Dejan Bosanac > ---------------------- > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > [email protected] > Twitter: @dejanb > Blog: http://sensatic.net > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 06/09/2014 08:20 PM, artnaseef wrote: > > > >> Everyone voting "+1" -- what about the concern with AMQ-4277? > >> > >> Especially Claus who marked it as RESOLVED. > >> > >> Please help me to get this cleared up. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > >> nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-0-Release- > >> Candidate-2-tp4681721p4681924.html > >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> If there's still a problem the right thing to do is reopen and work > > towards a unit test and a fix for the next release, v5.10.0 won't be the > > last ActiveMQ release ever. > > > > > > -- > > Tim Bish > > Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc. > > [email protected] | www.fusesource.com | www.redhat.com > > skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121 > > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > > > >
