I reopened the issue and mark it for 5.11. I don’t think this issue is a blocker for this release. Having said that, the vote was open for 5 days with not -1s, so I’ll close it now and continue with the release.
Regards -- Dejan Bosanac ---------------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat [email protected] Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/09/2014 08:20 PM, artnaseef wrote: > >> Everyone voting "+1" -- what about the concern with AMQ-4277? >> >> Especially Claus who marked it as RESOLVED. >> >> Please help me to get this cleared up. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. >> nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-0-Release- >> Candidate-2-tp4681721p4681924.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> If there's still a problem the right thing to do is reopen and work > towards a unit test and a fix for the next release, v5.10.0 won't be the > last ActiveMQ release ever. > > > -- > Tim Bish > Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc. > [email protected] | www.fusesource.com | www.redhat.com > skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121 > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >
