AFAIK there is no distinction between trunk and branches in GIT. One of the branches just happens to be called "master".
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Jim Gomes <e.se...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't really know the conventions of git, but are the branches still > called "branches", or are they "servants"? Trunk/branches is a consistent > metaphor. Master/branches is mixing metaphors. > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015, 1:52 PM Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 01/05/2015 01:27 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > > It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days. > > > > > > I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow > > > overlooked. Any objection to rename? > > > > > > Hadrian > > > > > > > > > -- > > Tim Bish > > Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc. > > tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com > > skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121 > > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.” Antoine de Saint Exupéry
