+1 Maybe we should wait with the rename until we have 5.11.0 released (there’s some work involved like reconfiguring jenkins and stuff, so it'll delay release)
Regards -- Dejan Bosanac ---------------------- Red Hat, Inc. dbosa...@redhat.com Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for the rename. > > Using "master" is typical and this is definitely a change now made by > infra during migrations, based on experience of migrating a couple of > things into Git repos at Qpid recently. > > On 5 January 2015 at 18:27, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days. > > > > I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow overlooked. > Any > > objection to rename? > > > > Hadrian >
