It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names? On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it. > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it. > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> > >> > On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name > >> > other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM > >> > confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to > >> > give it? > >> > >> Hermes? That would be Apollo’s half brother. > >> > >> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister. > >> > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Hiram Chirino > >> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > >> > [email protected] <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com > >> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel Kulp > >> [email protected] <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog > >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > *Christian Posta* > > twitter: @christianposta > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog > > http://fabric8.io > > > > -- > Hiram Chirino > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > [email protected] <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino >
