I vote for ActiveMQ-RS. Four reasons: 1. RS stands for Research. 2. RS is alphabetically sequential after Q, and it's fun to say. 3. Seriously doubt it'll clash with a trademarked name. 4. Fits with our other existing sub-project naming conventions (ActiveMQ-NMS, ActiveMQ-CPP, etc.). On Apr 8, 2015 3:06 PM, "Greg Stein" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:34:37PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >... > > That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a > > name of a *Project* SHOULD be easier (but again, we'll verify with > > trademarks@ when we've decided on name). The name should always > > be referred to as "Apache ActiveMQ-BLAH" and never "Apache BLAH" or > > just "BLAH". The exception would be the normal dev chatter on our > > dev list. This is just like the Apache ActiveMQ-NMS and Apache > > ActiveMQ-CMS we have now. > > Right. Since "ActiveMQ" will be in its release name, you've already > got your trademark bits handled, and avoided conflict with anything > else. Find a codename and move along. trademarks@ isn't really needed > as long as it remains a sub-name of ActiveMQ. Chris is just reacting > strongly because of the past use of HornetQ, which is RH's mark. That > is past, so we can skip worrying about that. > > I look forward to your choices, and the Board report in a couple weeks. > > Cheers, > -g >
