Nope.
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 09:18:28AM -0400, James Carman wrote: > It is a good name. Do we need to engage trademarks@ for code names? > > On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I do like Artemis. ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring to it. > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta > > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected] > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected] > > <javascript:;>> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name > > >> > other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM > > >> > confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to > > >> > give it? > > >> > > >> Hermes? That would be Apollo???s half brother. > > >> > > >> Or Artemis, Apollo???s twin sister. > > >> > > >> > > >> Dan > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Hiram Chirino > > >> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > > >> > [email protected] <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com > > >> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Daniel Kulp > > >> [email protected] <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog > > >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Christian Posta* > > > twitter: @christianposta > > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog > > > http://fabric8.io > > > > > > > > -- > > Hiram Chirino > > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > > [email protected] <javascript:;> | fusesource.com | redhat.com > > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > >
