> To me it seems like 1 project and 2 teams. In my opinion, one could chalk this up to the fact that the two communities are in the process of consolidating. It seems natural to me that there would be an initial separation. All the re-branding and transition work for the IP clearance phase is best (and most safely) done by folks already familiar with the code-base so it's not clear to me that the current base of committers on Artemis is problematic. Furthermore, the overall plan for the donated code-base was obviously not communicated with sufficient clarity for all involved and that has almost certainly impacted more wide-spread involvement. Once the plan from the PMC is clear and once ActiveMQ Artemis 1.0 is released (assuming that will be the plan - not something I take for granted) I would expect additional community participation. In fact, I've already seen encouraging signs with Jeff Genender's latest PR and discussion(s) in IRC.
Justin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tracy Snell" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:54:38 AM Subject: Re: Special Board Report > On Apr 20, 2015, at 9:24 PM, Tracy Snell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 20, 2015, at 8:54 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> It was pretty clear from the beginning this was going to be a >> sub-project and we would incorporate changes.. there was a new repo >> open, a new JIRA open, new jiras fed... and 205 Pull requests with >> about 400 committs in 4 months… > > Yes. Almost exclusively done by the HornetQ team (going by the commit logs > and the team page at HornetQ’s website). On the committer side of the community here’s a log of AMQ6 (count, committer, affiliation). [All pages of https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-6.git;a=shortlog <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-6.git;a=shortlog> pasted into a file then: cut -f 2 | sort | uniq -c and adding affiliation, Yeah, I was too lazy to load the git repo] Commits Name Employer 148 Clebert Suconic RedHat HornetQ Commit 133 Martyn Taylor RedHat 116 Andy Taylor RedHat HornetQ Commit 57 jbertram RedHat HornetQ Commit 16 Howard Gao RedHat HornetQ Commit 2 Robert Gemmell RedHat 1 Claus Ibsen RedHat 1 Felix Becker 1 Ivo Studensky RedHat 1 John D. Ament 1 nberdikov Of those active only Martyn didn’t have commit on the Jboss HornetQ team (as far as I can tell). It could be that others are contributing code that’s committed by one of the above by why do that if you have commit? On a side note, that’s a LOT of work by the HornetQ guys! As a comparison here’s the commits to the activemq repo over approximately the same time span. Commits Name 98 Timothy Bish 96 gtully 48 Dejan Bosanac 10 Daniel Kulp 8 Claus Ibsen 8 Hadrian Zbarcea 8 artnaseef 6 Christian Posta 5 Hiram Chirino 5 Robert Gemmell 3 Jeff Genender 2 Kevin Earls 1 Arthur Naseef 1 Ciprian Ciubotariu 1 Matt Warhaftig No crossover (except Claus and I think he somehow finds time to commit code to almost every apache project there is). To me it seems like 1 project and 2 teams.
