Yeah I think 1.1.0 fits better too, both for whats actually in it now and also for a future approach like Claus mentioned.
Robbie On 13 August 2015 at 08:53, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I think 1.1.0 is better. > > Maybe here in the start where more new functions is added / ported > from AMQ 5.x then the upcoming releases are IMHO more fitted as new > minor releases, than patch releases. > > And then when Artemis has a great set of features in 1.x, then > dedicated patch releases could be done which are more careful selected > bug fixes etc. > > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Clebert Suconic > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I believe we should be ready for a release the end of this week, early >> next week. >> >> >> I was going to call it 1.0.1 since my original plan was to keep >> calilng these 1.0.1, 1.0.2, ... 1.0.n until the JIRAs on the release >> 1.1.0 were fixed. >> >> >> however since the addition of the first MQTT protocol, that makes it a >> new / major feature. I'm not sure we should call it 1.0.1 or 1.1.0 >> now. >> >> >> We have also fixed logs of bugs.. and I'm currently doing some work on >> examples (adding an openwire example and doing some work on open wire) >> >> >> There are a lot of fixes around openwire as well. >> >> Any ideas on the release name? > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > Camel in Action 2nd edition: http://www.manning.com/ibsen2
