Just to add, I think from 1.1 we do it the way suggested i.e minor versions for patch releases etc but until Artemis can be regarded as a possible alternative to activemq I think stick to 1.0.1, having lots of major versions will just confuse people imo
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:03 Andy Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > I have to disagree. We haven't really done a real major release. This > first one was for ip clearance and we will be adding new functionality in > every release and we don't want to end up at 1.20 before we know it. To me > 1.1 will be the first release where we have some sort of feature parity > with activemq. > > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:49 Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> ok, we will do 1.1.0 (You convinced me.. through twitter actually ;) )... >> >> thinking again 1.0.1 makes it looks too minor... and there is a lot of >> work done on artemis for this release, thanks for all the >> contributions... It's really nice seeing great contributions here... >> thanks everybody. (I can't name them all) >> >> >> I would like to be the release manager for this release, but I won't >> be around next week, otherwise I would start the process sooner, so i >> will do it in 2 weeks possibly as a heads up. >> >> >> Meanwhile, it would be nice people trying out and give us feedback on >> two things from master: * >> - try out MQTT. There's a small example under ./examples/protocols/mqtt >> - look at our improved examples under ./examples (on both distro and >> source) >> >> >> * { >> # how to build master: >> git clone https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis.git artemis >> cd artemis >> mvn install >> cd >> artemis-distribution/target/apache-artemis-1.0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin/apache-artemis-1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/ >> >> # ^^ That is the distribution. >> } >> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > I think 1.1.0 is better. >> > >> > Maybe here in the start where more new functions is added / ported >> > from AMQ 5.x then the upcoming releases are IMHO more fitted as new >> > minor releases, than patch releases. >> > >> > And then when Artemis has a great set of features in 1.x, then >> > dedicated patch releases could be done which are more careful selected >> > bug fixes etc. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Clebert Suconic >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I believe we should be ready for a release the end of this week, early >> >> next week. >> >> >> >> >> >> I was going to call it 1.0.1 since my original plan was to keep >> >> calilng these 1.0.1, 1.0.2, ... 1.0.n until the JIRAs on the release >> >> 1.1.0 were fixed. >> >> >> >> >> >> however since the addition of the first MQTT protocol, that makes it a >> >> new / major feature. I'm not sure we should call it 1.0.1 or 1.1.0 >> >> now. >> >> >> >> >> >> We have also fixed logs of bugs.. and I'm currently doing some work on >> >> examples (adding an openwire example and doing some work on open wire) >> >> >> >> >> >> There are a lot of fixes around openwire as well. >> >> >> >> Any ideas on the release name? >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Claus Ibsen >> > ----------------- >> > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >> > Camel in Action 2nd edition: http://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >> >> >> >> -- >> Clebert Suconic >> >
