. To be honest I > guess it doesn't matter if it's 1 > 0.1 or 1.1 but to me 1.1 implies a milestone of some sort has been reached.
The current branch has Mqtt and lots of improvements compared to 1.0.0. It's not just a minor update. So it is a milestone to me. Anyways. Users are more likely to look at major updates than patch releases. If this was just bug fixing the it should be a patch release I agree. > >> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:07 Clebert <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Say you put this as 1.0.1. A month from now there is a bug fix and an >> user don't want all the updates from 1.0.2 on his production env. What >> would call it? 1.0.1.1? >> >> These releases are production ready and not beta. >> >> We can promote it to 2.0.0 when we decide we have a whole completion of >> desires features and beyond. >> >> I originally proposed 1.0.1 but I have to agree it gets confusing on >> calling these minor updates. >> >> >>> On Aug 13, 2015, at 13:03, Andy Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I have to disagree. We haven't really done a real major release. This >> first >>> one was for ip clearance and we will be adding new functionality in every >>> release and we don't want to end up at 1.20 before we know it. To me 1.1 >>> will be the first release where we have some sort of feature parity with >>> activemq. >>> >>>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:49 Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> ok, we will do 1.1.0 (You convinced me.. through twitter actually ;) >> )... >>>> >>>> thinking again 1.0.1 makes it looks too minor... and there is a lot of >>>> work done on artemis for this release, thanks for all the >>>> contributions... It's really nice seeing great contributions here... >>>> thanks everybody. (I can't name them all) >>>> >>>> >>>> I would like to be the release manager for this release, but I won't >>>> be around next week, otherwise I would start the process sooner, so i >>>> will do it in 2 weeks possibly as a heads up. >>>> >>>> >>>> Meanwhile, it would be nice people trying out and give us feedback on >>>> two things from master: * >>>> - try out MQTT. There's a small example under ./examples/protocols/mqtt >>>> - look at our improved examples under ./examples (on both distro and >>>> source) >>>> >>>> >>>> * { >>>> # how to build master: >>>> git clone https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis.git artemis >>>> cd artemis >>>> mvn install >>>> cd >> artemis-distribution/target/apache-artemis-1.0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin/apache-artemis-1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/ >>>> >>>> # ^^ That is the distribution. >>>> } >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> I think 1.1.0 is better. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe here in the start where more new functions is added / ported >>>>> from AMQ 5.x then the upcoming releases are IMHO more fitted as new >>>>> minor releases, than patch releases. >>>>> >>>>> And then when Artemis has a great set of features in 1.x, then >>>>> dedicated patch releases could be done which are more careful selected >>>>> bug fixes etc. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Clebert Suconic >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> I believe we should be ready for a release the end of this week, early >>>>>> next week. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I was going to call it 1.0.1 since my original plan was to keep >>>>>> calilng these 1.0.1, 1.0.2, ... 1.0.n until the JIRAs on the release >>>>>> 1.1.0 were fixed. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> however since the addition of the first MQTT protocol, that makes it a >>>>>> new / major feature. I'm not sure we should call it 1.0.1 or 1.1.0 >>>>>> now. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We have also fixed logs of bugs.. and I'm currently doing some work on >>>>>> examples (adding an openwire example and doing some work on open wire) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> There are a lot of fixes around openwire as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any ideas on the release name? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Claus Ibsen >>>>> ----------------- >>>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>>>> Camel in Action 2nd edition: http://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Clebert Suconic >>
