also, there has also been questions about it during the donation process.. licenses reviewed.. etc.. so I don't think we need to open a new discussions over this. the binary inclusion on the source was something that was fixed now.
The dependency on libaio on the C code is through through dynamic linked library, and is the same as any C code depending on libc or gcc. On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:55 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just wondering, does anyone plan to raise the LGPL question w/ legal >> discuss? If we're waiting for the new year to do the next release, would >> be good to at least start the discussion. > > > We had such discussion long ago with legal. I couldn't find that email > on my inbox but we specifically asked questions about it. We were ok > as I remember. Maybe someone else (Martyn?) will have it on their > inboxes. For that reason I don't want to go over the same issue we had > asked before. > > The use of libaio is optional anyways and the system works as > expected. what also covers other questions we had here on this thread. -- Clebert Suconic
