Libaio is a kernel feature. Part of the Linux kernel. It's optional and the cli default to it if available in the OS. As Andy said.
If what you are saying was true thought Apache HTTP would for instance have serious problems with libc and other libraries it's using for example. Libaio is part of the architecture / OS we are running on. But regardless it's use is optional. I don't see a reason for such big deal at this time. > On Dec 23, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Andy Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's a configuration option in the broker.xml. however by default the cli > will default to use it. Saying that it will only use it if it's libation > has been installed, if it hasn't then NIO us used. > >> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 21:07 John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Are you referring to the bin or src distribution? >> >>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 4:05 PM Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Question: If I grab Artemis 1.1.0 tarbal/zip and start up the broker “out >>> of the box”, does it use libaio or not? If I specifically have to >>> configure something (pass a flag, edit a config file, etc…) to enable use >>> if the LGPL library, then fine. However, if it’s something that occurs >>> completely automatically without the user even knowing that it’s >> occurring, >>> then I have a major problem with it. It needs to be something that the >>> user has to explicitly CHOOSE to use. >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Dec 23, 2015, at 2:02 PM, Clebert Suconic < >> [email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> also, there has also been questions about it during the donation >>>> process.. licenses reviewed.. etc.. so I don't think we need to open a >>>> new discussions over this. the binary inclusion on the source was >>>> something that was fixed now. >>>> >>>> The dependency on libaio on the C code is through through dynamic >>>> linked library, and is the same as any C code depending on libc or >>>> gcc. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Clebert Suconic >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:55 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected] >>> >>> wrote: >>>>>> Just wondering, does anyone plan to raise the LGPL question w/ legal >>>>>> discuss? If we're waiting for the new year to do the next release, >>> would >>>>>> be good to at least start the discussion. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We had such discussion long ago with legal. I couldn't find that email >>>>> on my inbox but we specifically asked questions about it. We were ok >>>>> as I remember. Maybe someone else (Martyn?) will have it on their >>>>> inboxes. For that reason I don't want to go over the same issue we had >>>>> asked before. >>>>> >>>>> The use of libaio is optional anyways and the system works as >>>>> expected. what also covers other questions we had here on this thread. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Clebert Suconic >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Kulp >>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog >>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >>
