What about this .....
I want to learn something knew :) and I want t a break after what I'm doing now. Let's try making a prototype around next month. (April) If it gets too difficult we go back to the hawt io road. ???? On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:56 PM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > I liked Martyn's proposal for being a cool thing :) > > > Just looked at this thing he mentioned (bootstrap).. man.. it's really > cool... > http://getbootstrap.com/getting-started/ > > > I'm not writing software just to be cool... but a great console would > definitely improve things... > > > One thing with a great UI though... our website still sucks :) > > > > - It provides a framework for plugins. So you can have one console that > > gives you access to ActiveMQ but also to other modules in your system > > - It uses jolokia to access the existing JMX layer over REST. So we do > not > > need to create an additional REST layer for the console on the AMQ and > > Artemis side > > - Uses a html/javascript client (Angular). So the client side is easy to > > install on any server > > > > So if we do not write a Hawtio plugin then we should still consider to > use > > jolokia to avoid overhead on the server side. > > I also think a framework to hook other plugins in would be great but for > > just the activemq and artemis consoles it is not absolutely necessary. > > +1... although I strongly encourage to keep the bits isolated. Not > only for easy switch between AMQ5 and Artemis, but eventually we could > include other technologies available on the console. (examples: AMQP > Management, JMX, some consoles standard that I don't remember now, or > any other thing yet to be invented).. All I'm asking is for standard > OO encapsulation. > > > > > So ideally I would like to have something like Hatwio at apache as a > generic > > base for a console where all apache projects can hook in via plugins. > > Unfortunately this is a lot of effort and I am not sure if we find enough > > manpower to do it. It would also be a project on its own and should not > be > > done at activemq. > > > > ..... if I had the time..... :/ > -- Clebert Suconic
