Do we a vote even for that? It seemed a no brainer. On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM Michael André Pearce < [email protected]> wrote:
> Should be deactivated now. > > > > > On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:51, Michael André Pearce < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > That would be my apologies on that i was setting up to make sure it > would work. I didn’t realise the ramifications I will disable it whilst we > await the time to elapse. > > > > Please accept my apologies > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:49, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote: > >>> Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control. > >>> > >>> This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the PMC. > >>> > >> > >> Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter account > that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC that was created from > a discussion that did not give the standard 72 hours for discussion and > either consensus or lazy consensus to occur. > >> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote: > >>>>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as > we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but > not all) > >>>> Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given > access as per the Apache social media policy. > >>>> > >>>>> Cheers > >>>>> Mike > >>>>> > >>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open, > will share on the Dev mail list also. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as > per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private > mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have some > advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers > >>>>>> Mike > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and > user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one > need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just > needed to reset bits if ever needed. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to > transfer) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the > owner to private mail list so pmc have control > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under > control the project PMC, refer to > >>>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic < > [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> No objection from my side. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" < > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to > increase > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in > the account > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I > believe all > >>>>>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, > (and simply > >>>>>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get > added if > >>>>>>>>>>>>> committer) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and > retweet of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> anything activemq. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong > objections, as > >>>>>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I > would look > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Tim Bish > >>>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121 > >>>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Tim Bish > >>>> twitter: @tabish121 > >>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >>>> > >> > >> -- > >> Tim Bish > >> twitter: @tabish121 > >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >> > -- Clebert Suconic
