On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.
This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the PMC.
Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter account
that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC that was created
from a discussion that did not give the standard 72 hours for discussion
and either consensus or lazy consensus to occur.
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as we set this
up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but not all)
Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given access as
per the Apache social media policy.
Cheers
Mike
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce <[email protected]>
wrote:
I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open, will share on
the Dev mail list also.
We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as per Apache
guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private mail list as it
seems the verify email from twitter is not received.
I have such asked for advice from the PMC.
Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have some advice how
they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome.
Cheers
Mike
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce <[email protected]>
wrote:
Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and user, that
means committers can login with their own accounts and no one need the
master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just needed to reset
bits if ever needed.
Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to transfer)
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce <[email protected]>
wrote:
Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the owner to private
mail list so pmc have control
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote:
Any official project social media account needs to be under control the project
PMC, refer to
https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>
wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:
No objection from my side.
Regards
JB
On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
It is possible to make a group account so would propose in the account
I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I believe all
become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, (and simply
if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get added if
committer)
The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features and retweet of
anything activemq.
Before doing this I want to check there is no strong objections, as
noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I would look
to setup end of the week.
Cheers
Mike
Sent from my iPad
--
Clebert Suconic
--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
