I think lazy concensus is ok. As long as no one has any objections I would think it's ok to move ahead with it under PMC control as Tim pointed out. But Tim is right that should give it 72 hours for people to see the thread and comment.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > Do we a vote even for that? It seemed a no brainer. > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM Michael André Pearce < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Should be deactivated now. > > > > > > > > > On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:51, Michael André Pearce < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > That would be my apologies on that i was setting up to make sure it > > would work. I didn’t realise the ramifications I will disable it whilst > we > > await the time to elapse. > > > > > > Please accept my apologies > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > >>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:49, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote: > > >>> Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control. > > >>> > > >>> This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the PMC. > > >>> > > >> > > >> Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter account > > that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC that was created > from > > a discussion that did not give the standard 72 hours for discussion and > > either consensus or lazy consensus to occur. > > >> > > >>> Sent from my iPhone > > >>> > > >>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote: > > >>>>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as > > we set this up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but > > not all) > > >>>> Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given > > access as per the Apache social media policy. > > >>>> > > >>>>> Cheers > > >>>>> Mike > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Sent from my iPhone > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open, > > will share on the Dev mail list also. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as > > per Apache guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on the private > > mail list as it seems the verify email from twitter is not received. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I have such asked for advice from the PMC. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Incase anyone has done this for other Apache projects and have > some > > advice how they handled this or get the verify email, it is welcome. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Cheers > > >>>>>> Mike > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:34, Michael André Pearce < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and > > user, that means committers can login with their own accounts and no one > > need the master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just > > needed to reset bits if ever needed. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all, this is easy to > > transfer) > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:19, Michael André Pearce < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the > > owner to private mail list so pmc have control > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Any official project social media account needs to be under > > control the project PMC, refer to > > >>>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic < > > [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> No objection from my side. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > > >>>>>>>>>>>> JB > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" < > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, > to > > increase > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to make a group account so would propose in > > the account > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would add all known committers tweet accounts to it, I > > believe all > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> become admin on doing this to avoid one person being admin, > > (and simply > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> if I miss you/don't know your tweet handle just msg to get > > added if > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> committer) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is we can tweet about releases, blogs, features > and > > retweet of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> anything activemq. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Before doing this I want to check there is no strong > > objections, as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> noted many other apache projects already do this. If none I > > would look > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to setup end of the week. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad > > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>> Tim Bish > > >>>>>>>>> twitter: @tabish121 > > >>>>>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Tim Bish > > >>>> twitter: @tabish121 > > >>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > >>>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Tim Bish > > >> twitter: @tabish121 > > >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > >> > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >
