On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.

This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug fixes,
improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really appreciate
everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so much!


I would like to highlight the features introduced on this release:

[ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
[ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic Naming Abilities
[ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
[ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
[ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and login.config
[ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging various
broker events
[ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
[ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple files
[ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for Queues


Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12342127



Source and binary distributions can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0


The Maven repository is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1156


In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html


The source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0

I will update the website after the vote has passed.



[ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Here's my +1


+1

* Validated license and notice files
* Validated signatures and checksums
* Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications against it
* Built from source and ran some of the tests
* Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had license headers

--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to