It’s not a regression.  I don’t think so.

I say we release against in 1 or 2 weeks with 2.5.1.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:55 PM Christopher Shannon <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Agree with Justin, I wouldn't stop this release unless it is a
> regression caused since 2.4.0.  We can always do bug fix releases even
> if they only contain a couple of fixes if they are of high importance.
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Justin Bertram <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > So is this a regression or a new issue?  If it's a regression then I
> think
> > it should be fixed.  If it's a new issue then I think it should go in
> 2.5.1
> > in short order.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Michael André Pearce <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >> So I have managed to create an integration test that re-creates the
> >> problem.
> >> https://github.com/michaelandrepearce/activemq-artemis/tree/
> >> NetworkHealthCheckIssue
> >>
> >> Essentially when NetworkHealthCheck detects network failure issue, the
> >> server is stopped, once the network issue is resolved, it obviously
> detects
> >> this and restart the server again.
> >>
> >> If prior to the network issue, a change validly is made (as we support
> >> reloading these sections) to broker.xml is made for address-settings,
> >> security-settings, address’s or queue’s these are lost when the server
> is
> >> restarted, when the above occurs.
> >>
> >> During the initialization stage it seems the broker is resetting it
> >> configured state back to the config that was very first loaded, not the
> >> config that was last/most recently reloaded.
> >>
> >> This in my view is a blocker as essentially broker is losing changed
> >> configured state and can cause obvious issues, when intermittent network
> >> issues occur, which in any system is likely at some point, either in
> >> disaster or network maintenance.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> > On 14 Mar 2018, at 21:02, Michael André Pearce <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > We’ve spotted a nasty issue, I’m trying to put an integration test
> >> together to have recreatable the problem, but taking me some time.
> >> >
> >> > Can you give me another 24hours? To create the test to share then for
> >> you to decide if the issue is blocking or not.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Sent from my iPhone
> >> >
> >> >> On 14 Mar 2018, at 09:50, Francesco Nigro <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> +1
> >> >>
> >> >> Compiled and run some tests on it
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Il giorno mer 14 mar 2018 alle ore 10:46 Dejan Bosanac <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> >> ha scritto:
> >> >>
> >> >>> +1
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regards
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Dejan Bosanac
> >> >>> http://sensatic.net/about
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> >> >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> +1
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>>> On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0 release.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including bug
> >> fixes,
> >> >>>>>> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really
> appreciate
> >> >>>>>> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank you so
> much!
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this
> release:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual Topic
> >> Naming
> >> >>>>>> Abilities
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm and
> >> >>>> login.config
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging
> various
> >> >>>>>> broker events
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple
> files
> >> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics for
> >> >>> Queues
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for the
> >> >>>>>> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >> >>>> projectId=12315920&version=12342127
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> The Maven repository is here:
> >> >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> >>>> orgapacheactivemq-1156
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on
> examples:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-
> >> >>>> guide/validating-releases.html
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> The source tag:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.
> >> >>>> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
> >> >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> >>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Here's my +1
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> +1
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> * Validated license and notice files
> >> >>>>> * Validated signatures and checksums
> >> >>>>> * Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications
> against
> >> >>> it
> >> >>>>> * Built from source and ran some of the tests
> >> >>>>> * Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files had
> >> >>>> license
> >> >>>>> headers
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> Tim Bish
> >> >>>>> twitter: @tabish121
> >> >>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >>
>
-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to