Typo but important one.
I think = i dont think

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------From: "michael.andre.pearce" 
<michael.andre.pea...@me.com> Date: 25/05/2018  21:35  (GMT+00:00) To: 
dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom serialization mechanism for 
ActiveMQMessages 
@Clebert
I think jms spec defines or cares how it should serialize especially over the 
wire, this is left to implementation, just that class should be serializable.
This is just implementation detail, keeping to the api method spec, so doesnt 
need a new jms type.


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

Reply via email to