Typo but important one. I think = i dont think
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message --------From: "michael.andre.pearce" <michael.andre.pea...@me.com> Date: 25/05/2018 21:35 (GMT+00:00) To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom serialization mechanism for ActiveMQMessages @Clebert I think jms spec defines or cares how it should serialize especially over the wire, this is left to implementation, just that class should be serializable. This is just implementation detail, keeping to the api method spec, so doesnt need a new jms type. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.