michaelandrepearce commented on a change in pull request #2528: ARTEMIS-2226
last consumer connection should close the previous consu…
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2528#discussion_r252917956
##########
File path:
artemis-protocols/artemis-mqtt-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/mqtt/MQTTProtocolManager.java
##########
@@ -62,11 +73,44 @@
List<BaseInterceptor> outgoingInterceptors) {
this.server = server;
this.updateInterceptors(incomingInterceptors, outgoingInterceptors);
+ server.getManagementService().addNotificationListener(this);
}
@Override
public void onNotification(Notification notification) {
- // TODO handle notifications
+ if (!(notification.getType() instanceof CoreNotificationType))
+ return;
+
+ CoreNotificationType type = (CoreNotificationType)
notification.getType();
+ if (type != CONSUMER_CREATED)
+ return;
+
+ TypedProperties props = notification.getProperties();
+
+ SimpleString protocolName =
props.getSimpleStringProperty(ManagementHelper.HDR_PROTOCOL_NAME);
+
+ if (protocolName == null ||
!protocolName.toString().equals(MQTTProtocolManagerFactory.MQTT_PROTOCOL_NAME))
+ return;
+
+ int distance = props.getIntProperty(ManagementHelper.HDR_DISTANCE);
+
+ if (distance > 0) {
+ SimpleString queueName =
props.getSimpleStringProperty(ManagementHelper.HDR_ROUTING_NAME);
+
+ Binding binding = server.getPostOffice().getBinding(queueName);
+ if (binding != null) {
+ Queue queue = (Queue) binding.getBindable();
+ String clientId =
props.getSimpleStringProperty(ManagementHelper.HDR_CLIENT_ID).toString();
+ //If the client ID represents a client already connected to the
server then the server MUST disconnect the existing client.
+ //Avoid consumers with the same client ID in the cluster appearing
at different nodes at the same time
+ Collection<Consumer> consumersSet = queue.getConsumers();
+ for (Consumer consumer : consumersSet) {
+ ServerConsumerImpl serverConsumer = (ServerConsumerImpl)
consumer;
+ if (clientId.equals(serverConsumer.getConnectionClientID()))
+ serverConsumer.getRemotingConnection().destroy();
Review comment:
Why is:
Adding a new cluster notification when the client’s connections connect to
Artemis,
it is the best way to address the MQTT agreement, but the cost is too great
Whats the cost? To me if you want the behaviour on connection behaviour this
truely would be better, rather than working on consumer
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
