I really like Martyn’s statement. TBH.

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:07 PM michael.andre.pearce
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I am just against making it seem we are exclusively broker only. Present
> it maybe. But past it wasnt and future i hope it isnt.Happy for an
> alternative. But atm i much prefer keeping it as Martyn had it.Sent from my
> Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> -------- Original message --------From: Justin Bertram <
> [email protected]> Date: 04/03/2019  20:53  (GMT+00:00) To:
> [email protected] Subject: Re: Website But where is the "suite" of
> projects?  The only things under activedevelopment/maintenance are the
> brokers.JustinOn Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 2:46 PM Michael André
> Pearce<[email protected]> wrote:> Thats kind of why i
> really liked the original tag line Martyn had:>> "A SUITE OF OPEN SOURCE
> PROJECTS FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE MESSAGING”>> Its bang on what the ActiveMQ
> community is about, for me.>>> > On 4 Mar 2019, at 20:31, Justin Bertram <
> [email protected]> wrote:> >> >> > I don't think "provider" is a good
> word at this point as it connotes some> > kind of service (e.g. a "cloud
> provider") and may be confusing.  I think> > "server" and "broker" would
> work fine as I don't think either of these> > exclude the inclusion of a
> client (e.g. "Java Application Server"> > implementations have always
> shipped various clients for remote EJB, JNDI,> > etc.). In my opinion, the
> term "platform" connotes a place where you run> > your application code,
> which ActiveMQ is not. There are certainly places> > for user code to run
> (e.g. interceptors, plugins), but that code is to> > serve the broader
> purpose of the server/broker as an integration point.> > Then again, maybe
> my opinion is in the minority. I'm willing to be> > convinced. Perhaps
> there are other good options we aren't considering.> >> > I don't want to
> artificially limit where the project can go in the> future,> > but I also
> want to call it what it is and it hasn't really departed from> > its
> historical legacy.>>

-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to