Those files seem mistaken to me. I just generated the API docs for 2.7.0 and I don't see anything like that.
Justin On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 5:37 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not clear if they are actually unused or not. It would probably be > good to understand how they come to exist regardless, so it doesnt > keep happening. The content looks a little different than the related > 'regular' javadoc files, but with headers stamped within seconds, so > they were presumably generated in the same run. From looking at the > svn + git repo history it seems like Martyn added the 1.3.0 files > directly, and Christopher added the 2.7.0 ones into the latest dir > following 2.7.0, with Clebert subsequently 're-adding' them in the > 2.7.0 dir while replacing the latest dir content during 2.8.0. > > Robbie > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 22:54, <michael.andre.pea...@me.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > Glad im not going crazy. If theyre not being used can they be removed > then? > > > > > > > > > > Anyone with non windows computer able to checkout and remove to help us > window people :) > > > > > > > > > > I miss my mac :( > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:22 AM +0100, "Robbie Gemmell" < > robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried this out and see the same, it appers to be because the 1.3.0 > > and 2.7.0 release docs javadoc dirs contain a set of files other > > releases dont, with names which are illegal on Windows. > > > > E.g if you look in > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/tree/master/src/components/artemis/documentation/javadocs/javadoc-1.3.0 > > there are a bunch of files named > > 'index.html?org%2Fapache%2Factivemq%2F<...etc..>', and the '?' isnt > > allowed in filenames on Windows. > > > > I dont know why these style of files exist for those releases and not > > for any others. From just browsing the content on the site, e.g > > > http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/javadocs/javadoc-1.3.0 > , > > its not clear to me when/if they are actually used. > > > > Robbie > > > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 18:36, wrote: > > > > > > Just a ping on this. Whilst i was able to make the change via github > editor. I still need to checkout so i can perform a build and produce new > site content. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the git clone issue im still struggling with. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am on windows not mac like i used to be incase thats a known issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:57 PM +0100, wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a new machine and having difficulty doing a brand new fresh > checkout or the website git repo, that i need to do to update the site > about the 1.8.0 nms api release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The error im getting is for a number of javadoc files in 2.7.0 and > 1.3.0 folders getting a "no such file or directory" on each one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The checkout subsequently fails. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Justin? Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
