+1 well done!! Il lun 18 mag 2020, 18:57 Howard Gao <howard....@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1. > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:26 AM Clebert Suconic < > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.13.0 release. > > > > > > This release will include these features: > > > > [ARTEMIS-2666] - Add management for duplicate ID cache > > [ARTEMIS-2726] - Implement min/max expiry-delay > > [ARTEMIS-2738] - Implement per-acceptor security domains > > [ARTEMIS-2739] - Artemis health check tool > > [ARTEMIS-2758] - Support disabling metrics per address > > [ARTEMIS-2761] - Supporting QUOTED-IDS on expressions to align with > > qpid-jms > > > > There was a significant improvement in AMQP. With a recent fix in Flow > > control combined with previous changes in scheduling, Performance in > > AMQP is significant fast to any previous version. I personally spent > > time on profiling AMQP and the server does not show much fat to cut on > > processing, which means.. that's really fast. > > > > AMQP is a serious contender to even Artemis Core protocol. > > > > The release notes is here: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12348088 > > > > The git commit report is here: > > > http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.13.0 > > > > > > Source and binary distributions can be found here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.13.0/ > > > > The Maven repository is here: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1209 > > > > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples: > > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html > > > > > > The source tag: > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.13.0 > > > > > > I will update the website after the vote has passed. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0 > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > Here's my +1 > > >