+1

* Validated signatures and checksums
* Verified license and notice files in the archives
* Checked source for license headers using Apache Rat plugin
* Built from source and ran the AMQP tests
* Ran the Qpid JMS example against the binary broker archive instance.
* Ran some AMQP performance tests to verify no more credit handling issues

On 5/18/20 12:26 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.13.0 release.


This release will include these features:

[ARTEMIS-2666] - Add management for duplicate ID cache
[ARTEMIS-2726] - Implement min/max expiry-delay
[ARTEMIS-2738] - Implement per-acceptor security domains
[ARTEMIS-2739] - Artemis health check tool
[ARTEMIS-2758] - Support disabling metrics per address
[ARTEMIS-2761] - Supporting QUOTED-IDS on expressions to align with qpid-jms

There was a significant improvement in AMQP. With a recent fix in Flow
control combined with previous changes in scheduling, Performance in
AMQP is significant fast to any previous version. I personally spent
time on profiling AMQP and the server does not show much fat to cut on
processing, which means.. that's really fast.

AMQP is a serious contender to even Artemis Core protocol.

The release notes is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12348088

The git commit report is here:
http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.13.0


Source and binary distributions can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.13.0/

The Maven repository is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1209

In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html


The source tag:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.13.0


I will update the website after the vote has passed.



[ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)


Here's my +1


--
Tim Bish

Reply via email to