I mean workaround for ARTEMIS-2815* On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 8:45 PM Krzysztof <h4v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 non-binding > > I checked the following things: > - Ran NMS.AMQP integration test suite > - Ran .NET Client for ActiveMQ Artemis integration test suite with removed > workaround for ARTEMIS-2614 > > Everything seems to be fine. > > Cheers > Krzysztof > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:09 PM michael.andre.pearce > <michael.andre.pea...@me.com.invalid> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) lgtmSent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. >> -------- Original message --------From: Christopher Shannon < >> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> Date: 13/07/2020 13:41 (GMT+00:00) >> To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis >> 2.14.0 +1, everything looks good to meOn Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:02 AM >> Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>wrote:> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at >> 14:26, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>> wrote:> >> > I would >> like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.14.0 release.> >> > We only >> added one feature as part of this release:> >> > [ARTEMIS-2770] - Update >> diverts using the management API> >> > And we have quite a few improvements >> on this release:> >> > [ARTEMIS-2109] - enable building Artemis with JDK >> 11+> > [ARTEMIS-2771] - Support JVM GC & thread metrics> > [ARTEMIS-2776] - >> Dockerfile improvements to startup arguments> > [ARTEMIS-2786] - Timestamp >> in console is incorrect> > [ARTEMIS-2787] - Allow a queue to be disabled, >> so that messages are not> > routed to it.> > [ARTEMIS-2797] - Reset queue >> properties by unsetting them in broker.xml> > [ARTEMIS-2807] - Avoid >> notifications on critical IO error> > [ARTEMIS-2820] - Undeploy diverts by >> removing them from broker.xml> > [ARTEMIS-2827] - Add >> addressMemoryUsagePercentage as metric> > [ARTEMIS-2828] - Add addressSize >> as metric> >> >> >> > The whole release notes is here:> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12348290&styleName=&projectId=12315920&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED_4d142d7a703c84c576af5fabc058fb51bb1473f2_lin> >> >> >> > Source and binary distributions can be found here:> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.14.0/> >> >> > The Maven repository is here:> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1214> >> >> > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:> >> >> http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html> >> >> >> > I will update the website after the vote has passed.> >> >> > [ ] >> +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0> > [ ] +0 no opinion> > [ ] >> -1 disapprove (and reason why)> > --> > Clebert Suconic>> +1 >> (non-binding)>> I checked things over as follows:> - Verified the signature >> + checksum files.> - Checked for LICENCE and NOTICE files in archives.> - >> Verified licence headers in the source archive using:> "mvn >> apache-rat:check -DskipLicenseCheck=false"> - Ran the source build and the >> AMQP integration tests on JDK 8 and 11 with:> "mvn clean install >> -DskipTests && cd tests/integration-tests/ && mvn> test -Ptests >> -Dtest=org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.amqp.**"> - Ran Qpid >> JMS 0.52.0 HelloWorld against a broker started from the> binary archive on >> JDK 8 and 11.>> Aside: the ballot paper style text at the bottom refers to >> 2.4.0, here> and in many prior votes similarly. I'd suggest that section >> just be> dropped from future votes to avoid it being stale, the people who >> need> to should already know the voting style (which the ballot format> >> doesn't entirely cover) so its mostly redundant, and it doesn't seem> like >> people actually use or read that bit.>> Robbie> > >
