Results for the ActiveMQ Artemis 2.14.0 release vote:
Vote passes with 9 Votes, 5 Binding and 4 non binding. The following votes were received: Binding: Clebert Suconic Timothy Bish Christopher Shannon Gary Tuly Michael Andre Pearce Non Binding: Howard Gao Domenico Francesco Bruscino Robbie Gemmel Krzystof Thank you to everyone who contributed and took the time to review the release candidate and vote. I'll update the website as soon as the mirrors are updated (I will wait 24 hours after I update SVN). Regards.. On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 2:47 PM Krzysztof <h4v...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I mean workaround for ARTEMIS-2815* > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 8:45 PM Krzysztof <h4v...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > > > I checked the following things: > > - Ran NMS.AMQP integration test suite > > - Ran .NET Client for ActiveMQ Artemis integration test suite with removed > > workaround for ARTEMIS-2614 > > > > Everything seems to be fine. > > > > Cheers > > Krzysztof > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:09 PM michael.andre.pearce > > <michael.andre.pea...@me.com.invalid> wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) lgtmSent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. > >> -------- Original message --------From: Christopher Shannon < > >> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> Date: 13/07/2020 13:41 (GMT+00:00) > >> To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis > >> 2.14.0 +1, everything looks good to meOn Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:02 AM > >> Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>wrote:> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at > >> 14:26, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>> wrote:> >> > I would > >> like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.14.0 release.> >> > We only > >> added one feature as part of this release:> >> > [ARTEMIS-2770] - Update > >> diverts using the management API> >> > And we have quite a few improvements > >> on this release:> >> > [ARTEMIS-2109] - enable building Artemis with JDK > >> 11+> > [ARTEMIS-2771] - Support JVM GC & thread metrics> > [ARTEMIS-2776] - > >> Dockerfile improvements to startup arguments> > [ARTEMIS-2786] - Timestamp > >> in console is incorrect> > [ARTEMIS-2787] - Allow a queue to be disabled, > >> so that messages are not> > routed to it.> > [ARTEMIS-2797] - Reset queue > >> properties by unsetting them in broker.xml> > [ARTEMIS-2807] - Avoid > >> notifications on critical IO error> > [ARTEMIS-2820] - Undeploy diverts by > >> removing them from broker.xml> > [ARTEMIS-2827] - Add > >> addressMemoryUsagePercentage as metric> > [ARTEMIS-2828] - Add addressSize > >> as metric> >> >> >> > The whole release notes is here:> >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12348290&styleName=&projectId=12315920&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED_4d142d7a703c84c576af5fabc058fb51bb1473f2_lin> > >> >> >> > Source and binary distributions can be found here:> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.14.0/> > >> >> > The Maven repository is here:> >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1214> > >> >> > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:> >> > >> http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html> > >> >> >> > I will update the website after the vote has passed.> >> >> > [ ] > >> +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0> > [ ] +0 no opinion> > [ ] > >> -1 disapprove (and reason why)> > --> > Clebert Suconic>> +1 > >> (non-binding)>> I checked things over as follows:> - Verified the signature > >> + checksum files.> - Checked for LICENCE and NOTICE files in archives.> - > >> Verified licence headers in the source archive using:> "mvn > >> apache-rat:check -DskipLicenseCheck=false"> - Ran the source build and the > >> AMQP integration tests on JDK 8 and 11 with:> "mvn clean install > >> -DskipTests && cd tests/integration-tests/ && mvn> test -Ptests > >> -Dtest=org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.amqp.**"> - Ran Qpid > >> JMS 0.52.0 HelloWorld against a broker started from the> binary archive on > >> JDK 8 and 11.>> Aside: the ballot paper style text at the bottom refers to > >> 2.4.0, here> and in many prior votes similarly. I'd suggest that section > >> just be> dropped from future votes to avoid it being stale, the people who > >> need> to should already know the voting style (which the ballot format> > >> doesn't entirely cover) so its mostly redundant, and it doesn't seem> like > >> people actually use or read that bit.>> Robbie> > > > > -- Clebert Suconic
