Hi Matt,

My preference would be to have a module in the codebase. It would "secure" the 
link between docker image and the actual code.

Regards
JB

> Le 8 févr. 2021 à 17:22, Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> JB/Charles-
> 
> We have some parameterized configs we can pitch in as well. I was thinking a 
> separate repo would make sense, vs a module within the main tree. Easier for 
> users to clone and customize.
> 
> Thoughts?
> [ ] Separate activemq-docker repo
> [ ] Add module to main ‘activemq’ tree
> 
> Thanks!
> -Matt Pavlovich
> 
>> On Feb 5, 2021, at 10:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Of course a discussion is always welcome.
>> 
>> To answer to your first question:
>> 
>> 1. Alpine is fine IMHO for ActiveMQ (lighter).
>> 2. Java 8 for ActiveMQ 5.15.x, Java 11 based image for ActiveMQ 5.16.x+
>> 3. The ActiveMQ Jira is there: 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/AMQ/issues/AMQ-7229?filter=allopenissues
>>  
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/AMQ/issues/AMQ-7229?filter=allopenissues>
>> I can create a component Docker on Jira.
>> 
>> IMHO, the docker image should use env variables to pass configuration (in 
>> activemq.xml), and we should provide README.md with some important 
>> information (I’m thinking the filesystem to use on some cloud provider, like 
>> EFS on AWS, etc).
>> By the way, I also have a Dockerfile for my production system (on Azure and 
>> AWS).
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 5 févr. 2021 à 21:45, Shank, Charles R <shan...@nationwide.com> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> 
>>> JB,
>>> 
>>> The dockerfile and image that we currently have available is specific to 
>>> Nationwide.  What I would like to propose is to have a community discussion 
>>> on the requirements so a generic docker image could be created that would 
>>> benefit the whole ActiveMQ community.
>>> 
>>> For example:
>>> Do we build it using Debian or alpine?
>>> Java version?
>>> Items like this - also where does the jira board for ActiveMQ reside?
>>> 
>>> I look forward to working with you and the others in the ActiveMQ community
>>> 
>>> Thank you in advance
>>> Chuck Shank
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> 
>>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 11:55 AM
>>> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 has been released!
>>> 
>>> Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use 
>>> CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. 
>>> (Sender: dev-return-72165-SHANKC1=nationwide....@activemq.apache.org)
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Awesome !
>>> 
>>> Do you already have a Dockerfile ready ?
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
>>>> Le 5 févr. 2021 à 17:52, Shank, Charles R <shan...@nationwide.com> a écrit 
>>>> :
>>>> 
>>>> Nationwide would like to be involved in creating a standard image that 
>>>> could be used by the open source community for ActiveMQ
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> 
>>>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 11:49 AM
>>>> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
>>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 has been released!
>>>> 
>>>> Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use 
>>>> CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. 
>>>> (Sender: dev-return-72163-SHANKC1=nationwide....@activemq.apache.org)
>>>> 
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> We don’t have "official" Apache image 
>>>> (https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq 
>>>> <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq>).
>>>> 
>>>> I create such image for Apache Karaf 
>>>> (https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf 
>>>> <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf>).
>>>> 
>>>> Maybe we can create a Jira about that and start something about that.
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>> 
>>>>> Le 5 févr. 2021 à 17:45, Shank, Charles R <shan...@nationwide.com> a 
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>> 
>>>>> Good morning, I appreciate the emails I have been receiving - I would 
>>>>> like to know if there is a standard docker image of ActiveMQ that is used 
>>>>> by the AMQ community that is used in a kubernetes container?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you
>>>>> Chuck Shank
>>>>> Nationwide Insurance
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> 
>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 11:38 AM
>>>>> To: dev@activemq.apache.org; u...@activemq.apache.org
>>>>> Cc: annou...@apache.org
>>>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 has been released!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use 
>>>>> CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. 
>>>>> (Sender: dev-return-72161-SHANKC1=nationwide....@activemq.apache.org)
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>> 
>>>>> The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5161-release 
>>>>> <http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5161-release>
>>>>> 
>>>>> This release includes updates, and improvements, especially:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Fix on the runtime configuration plugin, allowing to work with both 
>>>>> JDK8 and JDK9+
>>>>> - Prefetch & invalid certificate warnings now include details about the 
>>>>> client
>>>>> - bunch of dependency updates, addressing third party fixes and CVE
>>>>> - new simple logout link on admin console
>>>>> - improved Apache Karaf features
>>>>> - and much more !
>>>>> 
>>>>> Enjoy !
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> —
>>>>> The ActiveMQ Team
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to