Very great job.
Looks good to me.

+1

I'll see if we can get it included in TomEE asap to see where we are in
terms of TCK.

Le jeu. 16 nov. 2023, 02:16, Eraskin, Aleksei <aleks...@amazon.com.invalid>
a écrit :

> Hi Team,
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> All of our internal tests passed for ActiveMQ 6.0.0. Looking forward to
> seeing it in public!
>
> Thanks,
> Aleksei Eraskin
> Software Development Engineer, Amazon MQ
> email: aleks...@amazon.com
>
> On 2023-11-14, 2:06 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:
> j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0
> > release to your vote.
> >
> > This release is a big milestone for ActiveMQ, starting the new 6.x
> series.
> >
> > It's the second RC where we fixed AMQ-9388 detected during the first
> vote.
> >
> >
> > This release includes a bunch of changes, especially:
> > - Jakarta Messaging 3.1, JMS 2.0, JMS 1.1 (still work to do to be
> > fully complete)
> > - Jakarta EE namespace support
> > - JDK17/21 support
> > - Spring 6.x
> > - Jetty 11.x
> > - Apache Camel 4.x
> > - Jolokia 2.x
> > - and much much more!
> >
> >
> > Release Notes:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12352570
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&amp;version=12352570
> >
> >
> >
> > Maven Staging Repository:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1381/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1381/
> >
> >
> >
> > Dist Staging Repository:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/6.0.0/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/6.0.0/>
> >
> >
> > Git tag: activemq-6.0.0
> >
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to