+1

Ran the full build on my Ubuntu 20.04 system.

Note that I ran into a test failure on BrokerXmlConfigStartTest due to the
test reusing port 61616 quickly, and getting "port already in use" errors.
I know others have run this test without problem, so I'm not going to worry
about it for now.

All other tests passed.

Art


On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 2:11 AM Jamie G. <jamie.goody...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1,
>
> Cheers,
> Jamie
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 3:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I did the same tests I did during release preparation :)
> > Some fixes/polish to do for 6.0.1 but nothing blocker :)
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0
> > > release to your vote.
> > >
> > > This release is a big milestone for ActiveMQ, starting the new 6.x
> series.
> > >
> > > It's the second RC where we fixed AMQ-9388 detected during the first
> vote.
> > >
> > > This release includes a bunch of changes, especially:
> > > - Jakarta Messaging 3.1, JMS 2.0, JMS 1.1 (still work to do to be
> > > fully complete)
> > > - Jakarta EE namespace support
> > > - JDK17/21 support
> > > - Spring 6.x
> > > - Jetty 11.x
> > > - Apache Camel 4.x
> > > - Jolokia 2.x
> > > - and much much more!
> > >
> > > Release Notes:
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12352570
> > >
> > > Maven Staging Repository:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1381/
> > >
> > > Dist Staging Repository:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/6.0.0/
> > >
> > > Git tag: activemq-6.0.0
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks !
> > > Regards
> > > JB
>

Reply via email to