Congratulations and thank you to everyone who contributed to this major
milestone!

Bruce

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 3:23 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> this vote passed with the following result:
>
> +1 (binding): Chris Shannon, JB Onofré, Art Naseef
> +1 (non binding): François Papon, Aleksei Eraskin, JL Monteiro, Jamie
> Goodyear, Matt Pavlovich
>
> I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org.
> I will merge the website related PR and I will update the website with
> javadoc, announcement, etc.
> Then, I will do the announcement.
>
> Thanks all for your vote !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0
> > release to your vote.
> >
> > This release is a big milestone for ActiveMQ, starting the new 6.x
> series.
> >
> > It's the second RC where we fixed AMQ-9388 detected during the first
> vote.
> >
> > This release includes a bunch of changes, especially:
> > - Jakarta Messaging 3.1, JMS 2.0, JMS 1.1 (still work to do to be
> > fully complete)
> > - Jakarta EE namespace support
> > - JDK17/21 support
> > - Spring 6.x
> > - Jetty 11.x
> > - Apache Camel 4.x
> > - Jolokia 2.x
> > - and much much more!
> >
> > Release Notes:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12352570
> >
> > Maven Staging Repository:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1381/
> >
> > Dist Staging Repository:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/6.0.0/
> >
> > Git tag: activemq-6.0.0
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
>


-- 
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>

Reply via email to