makes sense to me, lets give it a while for people to comemnt On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 15:30, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Renaming it seems reasonable if it is not actually going to be just a > plugin anymore. > > If everyone agrees, creating a new repo and deleting the old one might > be the quicker approach, since we can do the former ourselves whilst > the rest needs Infra to handle. They might also be more willing to > remove the other without a vote if pointed to discussion and a > replacement repo already existing. > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 12:41, Andy Taylor <andy.tayl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Devs, > > > > Recently we had a new repo created for the new Artemis console I am > working > > on. At the time the console was going to be a plugin similar to what we > > have, however after some design changes it is not more of an extension of > > hawtIO and not shipped as a plugin. The benefit here is that we now only > > need to deploy 1 endpoint in Jetty. > > > > That being the case I would like to rename the repo, or create a new one, > > named activemq-artemis-console which falls more in line with what the > > project actually is. > > > > What do you all think? > > > > If there are no objections I will get this done next week? > > > > Andy T >
