Many thanks Justin

On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, 15:43 Justin Bertram, <jbert...@apache.org> wrote:

> Done. Repo is available at:
>
>   https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-console
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 4:38 AM Andy Taylor <andy.tayl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > @Justin Bertram <jbert...@redhat.com>  If you could go ahead and create
> > the new repo then give me some time to move stuff over before deleting
> the
> > current one. Just to confirm the new repo name is
> 'activemq-artemis-console'
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 15:32, Andy Taylor <andy.tayl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> makes sense to me, lets give it a while for people to comemnt
> >>
> >> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 15:30, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Renaming it seems reasonable if it is not actually going to be just a
> >>> plugin anymore.
> >>>
> >>> If everyone agrees, creating a new repo and deleting the old one might
> >>> be the quicker approach, since we can do the former ourselves whilst
> >>> the rest needs Infra to handle. They might also be more willing to
> >>> remove the other without a vote if pointed to discussion and a
> >>> replacement repo already existing.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 12:41, Andy Taylor <andy.tayl...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Devs,
> >>> >
> >>> > Recently we had a new repo created for the new Artemis console I am
> >>> working
> >>> > on. At the time the console was going to be a plugin similar to what
> we
> >>> > have, however after some design changes it is not more of an
> extension
> >>> of
> >>> > hawtIO and not shipped as a plugin. The benefit here is that we now
> >>> only
> >>> > need to deploy 1 endpoint in Jetty.
> >>> >
> >>> > That being the case I would like to rename the repo, or create a new
> >>> one,
> >>> > named activemq-artemis-console which falls more in line with what the
> >>> > project actually is.
> >>> >
> >>> > What do you all think?
> >>> >
> >>> > If there are no objections I will get this done next week?
> >>> >
> >>> > Andy T
> >>>
> >>
>

Reply via email to