@Justin Bertram <jbert...@redhat.com> If you could go ahead and create the new repo then give me some time to move stuff over before deleting the current one. Just to confirm the new repo name is 'activemq-artemis-console'
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 15:32, Andy Taylor <andy.tayl...@gmail.com> wrote: > makes sense to me, lets give it a while for people to comemnt > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 15:30, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Renaming it seems reasonable if it is not actually going to be just a >> plugin anymore. >> >> If everyone agrees, creating a new repo and deleting the old one might >> be the quicker approach, since we can do the former ourselves whilst >> the rest needs Infra to handle. They might also be more willing to >> remove the other without a vote if pointed to discussion and a >> replacement repo already existing. >> >> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 12:41, Andy Taylor <andy.tayl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Devs, >> > >> > Recently we had a new repo created for the new Artemis console I am >> working >> > on. At the time the console was going to be a plugin similar to what we >> > have, however after some design changes it is not more of an extension >> of >> > hawtIO and not shipped as a plugin. The benefit here is that we now only >> > need to deploy 1 endpoint in Jetty. >> > >> > That being the case I would like to rename the repo, or create a new >> one, >> > named activemq-artemis-console which falls more in line with what the >> > project actually is. >> > >> > What do you all think? >> > >> > If there are no objections I will get this done next week? >> > >> > Andy T >> >
