I'm not against GH discussions but I think we should consider this across the entire project rather than just for activemq-cpp because a lack of consistency can cause confusion for ActiveMQ users.
Domenico On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 at 22:43, Ken Liao <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds good to me as well! > > Thanks, > Ken > > On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 1:47 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > It sounds good to me (I proposed something similar for activemq > > classic a while ago but we didn't get consensus). > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 2:16 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > I propose enabling discussions and issues on the activemq-cpp > repository. > > > > > > There would be no JIRA migration, the plan would be to open new issues > > there and allow existing JIRA issues to drain or be migrated by hand as > > needed. > > > > > > Rationale— work on this repository is gearing back up. Localizing > issues > > and discussions is a way to support the effort by having all the things > in > > one place. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Matt Pavlovich > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > > > > > > >
