Hi Colm-

I think that is essential the plan for ActiveMQ 6.2.0. Are you seeing other?

The upgrade work for Jetty 12 is almost done — check PR here:

https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1344

Thanks,
Matt

> On Sep 5, 2025, at 3:47 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It's increasingly a problem that the only ActiveMQ classic releases available 
> use EOL libraries (Spring 6.1, Jetty 11), in terms of running CVEs in 
> production. I'd like to respectfully request that the focus is on updating to 
> Jetty 12 and releasing, rather than delaying AMQ 6.2.0 for other features. 
> I'm happy to help out with dependency updates, testing etc.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Colm.
> 
> On 2025/08/08 13:20:20 Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>> For 6.2.0 I propose merging the Virtual Thread tech preview feature and move 
>> to Jetty 12.
>> 
>> The Jetty 12 PR is ~80% complete.
>> 
>> Matt Pavlovich
>> 
>>> On Aug 7, 2025, at 5:38 PM, Christopher Shannon 
>>> <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> JB,
>>> 
>>> Sorry for the delayed response, I think the time frame for a 6.1.8 release
>>> is fine.
>>> 
>>> For 6.2.0 that timeline seems ok assuming it's ready by that date, I would
>>> need to go back and look at the proposals for the new Jakarta features, but
>>> is there any particular one you had in mind to include?
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 3:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> 
>>>> I propose:
>>>> 1. ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.8 by end of August/beginning of September, as
>>>> a maintenance release, containing several fixes and dependency updates
>>>> 2. ActiveMQ Classic 6.2.0 by end of October/beginning of November. The
>>>> purpose here is to add at least one new feature to support Jakarta
>>>> Messaging 3.x.
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>> 
>>>> In the meantime, I'm working on a prototype for ActiveMQ Classic 7.x,
>>>> removing Spring dependency and using service discovery mechanism (for
>>>> destination policies, transport connectors, etc). Also I'm resuming
>>>> the investigation about replicated KahaDB.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org
>>>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org
>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org
> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
> 
> 

Reply via email to