Hi

It's a good comment Colm and that's exactly the proposal about
ActiveMQ 6.2.0 release.
The purposes of ActiveMQ 6.2.0 are:
1. Bump "major" dependency version (Spring, Jetty, etc)
2. Include new Jakarta Messaging 3.1 features

So we are on the same page here.

I proposed 6.2.0 for October, and I think we are on track. Matt worked
on Jetty 12 update, and I will help on that.
For the other major version bumps, it's almost done.

Regards
JB

On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 10:47 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's increasingly a problem that the only ActiveMQ classic releases available 
> use EOL libraries (Spring 6.1, Jetty 11), in terms of running CVEs in 
> production. I'd like to respectfully request that the focus is on updating to 
> Jetty 12 and releasing, rather than delaying AMQ 6.2.0 for other features. 
> I'm happy to help out with dependency updates, testing etc.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Colm.
>
> On 2025/08/08 13:20:20 Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> > For 6.2.0 I propose merging the Virtual Thread tech preview feature and 
> > move to Jetty 12.
> >
> > The Jetty 12 PR is ~80% complete.
> >
> > Matt Pavlovich
> >
> > > On Aug 7, 2025, at 5:38 PM, Christopher Shannon 
> > > <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > JB,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the delayed response, I think the time frame for a 6.1.8 release
> > > is fine.
> > >
> > > For 6.2.0 that timeline seems ok assuming it's ready by that date, I would
> > > need to go back and look at the proposals for the new Jakarta features, 
> > > but
> > > is there any particular one you had in mind to include?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 3:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi everyone,
> > >>
> > >> I propose:
> > >> 1. ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.8 by end of August/beginning of September, as
> > >> a maintenance release, containing several fixes and dependency updates
> > >> 2. ActiveMQ Classic 6.2.0 by end of October/beginning of November. The
> > >> purpose here is to add at least one new feature to support Jakarta
> > >> Messaging 3.x.
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts ?
> > >>
> > >> In the meantime, I'm working on a prototype for ActiveMQ Classic 7.x,
> > >> removing Spring dependency and using service discovery mechanism (for
> > >> destination policies, transport connectors, etc). Also I'm resuming
> > >> the investigation about replicated KahaDB.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> Regards
> > >> JB
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org
> > >> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org
> > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org
> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to