I have POC of migrating to use Jetty xml files for configuration, instead of hand wiring Spring beans to Jetty classes (approach used today).
This is the last major change for Jetty 12 support in ActiveMQ 6.2.0 I could use an assist on configuring the webapp deployments for /console and /api https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1344#issuecomment-3259514635 Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 5, 2025, at 10:00 AM, Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Colm- > > It would help if you test this change out (replace commons-lang3 with > built-in function): > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1469 > > Thanks, > Matt > >> On Sep 5, 2025, at 9:58 AM, Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Colm- >> >> I think that is essential the plan for ActiveMQ 6.2.0. Are you seeing other? >> >> The upgrade work for Jetty 12 is almost done — check PR here: >> >> https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1344 >> >> Thanks, >> Matt >> >>> On Sep 5, 2025, at 3:47 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> It's increasingly a problem that the only ActiveMQ classic releases >>> available use EOL libraries (Spring 6.1, Jetty 11), in terms of running >>> CVEs in production. I'd like to respectfully request that the focus is on >>> updating to Jetty 12 and releasing, rather than delaying AMQ 6.2.0 for >>> other features. I'm happy to help out with dependency updates, testing etc. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Colm. >>> >>> On 2025/08/08 13:20:20 Matt Pavlovich wrote: >>>> For 6.2.0 I propose merging the Virtual Thread tech preview feature and >>>> move to Jetty 12. >>>> >>>> The Jetty 12 PR is ~80% complete. >>>> >>>> Matt Pavlovich >>>> >>>>> On Aug 7, 2025, at 5:38 PM, Christopher Shannon >>>>> <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> JB, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for the delayed response, I think the time frame for a 6.1.8 release >>>>> is fine. >>>>> >>>>> For 6.2.0 that timeline seems ok assuming it's ready by that date, I would >>>>> need to go back and look at the proposals for the new Jakarta features, >>>>> but >>>>> is there any particular one you had in mind to include? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 3:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I propose: >>>>>> 1. ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.8 by end of August/beginning of September, as >>>>>> a maintenance release, containing several fixes and dependency updates >>>>>> 2. ActiveMQ Classic 6.2.0 by end of October/beginning of November. The >>>>>> purpose here is to add at least one new feature to support Jakarta >>>>>> Messaging 3.x. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>>> >>>>>> In the meantime, I'm working on a prototype for ActiveMQ Classic 7.x, >>>>>> removing Spring dependency and using service discovery mechanism (for >>>>>> destination policies, transport connectors, etc). Also I'm resuming >>>>>> the investigation about replicated KahaDB. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org >>>>>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org >>>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org >>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact >>> >>> >> >
