Hello @ Felix Cheung <[email protected]> and all, Regarding the WIP-Disclaimer, could you please advise what to include when it mentioned "the name of Apache TLP sponsor". I am not sure about this part.
Thank you very much. "Apache AGE is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of Apache TLP sponsor. " On 2021/01/19 05:58:03, Felix Cheung <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the updates. > > For disclaimer: it is your first release, so it is likely something is off > (for example, you have a dependency that is not compatible with Apache > license and normally will not be possible to release with) it is just easier > to get through the process. The community can decide if you want to go this > route or not. > > For OpenCypher - if it is a public spec from OpenCypher, it will be best not > to include a file but link to it. Even if license compatible it is best not > to include files, source code etc from another project because then proper > attribution should be there (typically in the LICENSE or NOTICE file) > > See bundled dependencies here https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html > > > ________________________________ > From: Eya Badal <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 7:32 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > Hi Felix, > > I just want to mention some points. > > 1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different names is > fixed now. > 2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source > distribution. > 3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and it is > included. > 4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP: > We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we have to go > by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice? > > All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending tasks so I > am not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress disclaimer. Please > advise. > > We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. > > Best regards, > > On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Eya Badal <[email protected]> > > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. > > >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and > > >ask everyone to vote? > > > > > > On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be > > > just the mentor. > > > > > > A good vote thread might be like: > > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html > > > > > > 1. md5 - should not include > > >I will remove this file. > > > > > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a > > > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip > > > and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/ > > > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file. > > > > > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure > > >it is consistent. > > > > > > 3. > > > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP > > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers > > >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? > > > > > > 4. > > > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf > > > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is there > > > a possible licensing issue? > > > > > >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache > > >License as well which is included in the licensing file. > > > 5, > > > KEYS.txt > > > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in git > > > repo > > > I will remove this as well. > > > > > >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or > > >thoughts. > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: Eya Badal <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM > > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > > > Dear Mentors, > > > > > > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the > > > following link: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > > > > > Could you please review and approve. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Eya > > > > > >
