Please disregard the previous message. I just replaced it with "the Apache Incubator PMC."
On 2021/01/21 23:29:50, Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello @ Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> and all, > > Regarding the WIP-Disclaimer, could you please advise what to include when it > mentioned "the name of Apache TLP sponsor". I am not sure about this part. > > Thank you very much. > > "Apache AGE is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache Software > Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of Apache TLP sponsor. " > > > On 2021/01/19 05:58:03, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the updates. > > > > For disclaimer: it is your first release, so it is likely something is off > > (for example, you have a dependency that is not compatible with Apache > > license and normally will not be possible to release with) it is just > > easier to get through the process. The community can decide if you want to > > go this route or not. > > > > For OpenCypher - if it is a public spec from OpenCypher, it will be best > > not to include a file but link to it. Even if license compatible it is best > > not to include files, source code etc from another project because then > > proper attribution should be there (typically in the LICENSE or NOTICE file) > > > > See bundled dependencies here https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> > > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 7:32 AM > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > Hi Felix, > > > > I just want to mention some points. > > > > 1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different names is > > fixed now. > > 2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source > > distribution. > > 3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and it is > > included. > > 4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP: > > We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we have to > > go by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice? > > > > All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending tasks so > > I am not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress disclaimer. > > Please advise. > > > > We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. > > > > Best regards, > > > > On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> > > > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM > > > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > > > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > > > Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. > > > >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list > > > >and ask everyone to vote? > > > > > > > > > On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t > > > > be just the mentor. > > > > > > > > A good vote thread might be like: > > > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html > > > > > > > > 1. md5 - should not include > > > >I will remove this file. > > > > > > > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a > > > > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip > > > > and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/ > > > > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file. > > > > > > > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure > > > >it is consistent. > > > > > > > > 3. > > > > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP > > > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers > > > >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? > > > > > > > > 4. > > > > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf > > > > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is > > > > there a possible licensing issue? > > > > > > > >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache > > > >License as well which is included in the licensing file. > > > > 5, > > > > KEYS.txt > > > > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in > > > > git repo > > > > I will remove this as well. > > > > > > > >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or > > > >thoughts. > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM > > > > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > > > > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > > > > > Dear Mentors, > > > > > > > > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the > > > > following link: > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > > > > > > > Could you please review and approve. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Eya > > > > > > > > > >
