Hello everyone, This email is calling a vote on the changes in import paths. It's been discussed in https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4e648d9421c792d4537f5ac66f1a16dce468f816fc5221a9f9db9433@%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
The vote will last for at least 1 week (July 30th 6pm CEST), and at least three +1 (binding) votes have been cast. The proposal to vote is based on the document from Kamil <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1F8zve5S78DXcjpPttW89HnqT0M0iKjT6fo9jX57Ef6A/edit#> The proposed solution is: - *Case 1: B: Contrib vs not: we move all that are "well" tested and rename contrib to "incubating" or similar.* - *Case 2: B: Airflow.operators.foo_operator.FooOperator could become airflow.operators.foo.FooOperator* - *Case 3: C: airflow.contrib.operators.gcp_bigtable_operator.BigTableOperator could become airflow.gcp.operators.bigtable.BigTableOperator* - *Case 4: B: no namespace introduction* - *Case 5: B: Keep "Operator" (and "Sensor") suffixes on class names* - *Case 6: We will treat isolated cases on case-by-case (and my team can do the job of GCP-related operators)* This is my (binding) +1 vote. Best regards, J. -- Jarek Potiuk Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
