On Feb 5 2020, at 11:59 am, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > So I would like that we - as a community - make an informed decision about > it without over-simplifications and biases. I have a kind request to those > interested in AIP-21 - can you please take a look and comment? I would not > like to be held by this for a long time, but I am super happy to discuss it > within the next few days and make voting about it (and in the meantime I > will test the "simpler" approach with just removing 1 file (and everything > that follows) and see if it works. We will then know more about what kind > and size of change we are comparing it to. >
If we make every namespace under airflow.* implict, then we have to ensure that our modules do not clash with _any and every_ possible top level package that exists in PyPi, because we cannot know what might be installed by our users. That seems like an impossible feat. Have I mis-understood? If I haven't mis-understoond then I this is I think a strong argument for _not_ making more than we absolutely have to an implicit namepsace. -a
