+1 On Thu, Nov 12, 2020, 19:13 Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Still looking for those +1s > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:38 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Just two providers to check this time: >> >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-backport-providers-elasticsearch/2020.11.13rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-backport-providers-google/2020.11.13rc1/ >> >> J. >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:20 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Need two more +1s :) >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:02 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Sounds good to me. >>>> >>>> I haven't tested any other providers yet, but consider by -0 vote >>>> retracted. >>>> >>>> -ash >>>> >>>> On Nov 9 2020, at 4:00 pm, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Cool. happy to release backports for those packages after current >>>> voting ends. >>>> >>>> It's now rather easy and takes very little time to prepare it and we >>>> got into the "release as needed" schedule. >>>> >>>> J. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:30 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> PR to fix it https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12200 >>>> -ash >>>> >>>> On Nov 9 2020, at 2:56 pm, Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Mostly -- the batch_waiters.json for Amazon was the one that wasn't. >>>> >>>> On Nov 9 2020, at 2:50 pm, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Indeed. Those were mostly examples, but it's good to have them :D. >>>> Thanks for catching this! >>>> >>>> J. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:40 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> -0 -- it turns out that we are missing data files in the packages! >>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12197 >>>> (-0 but not blocking, as this has probably been the case for a all >>>> previous backport providers we have released.) >>>> >>>> Fix coming soon anyway. >>>> >>>> -ash >>>> >>>> On Nov 9 2020, at 2:12 pm, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> I have cut Airflow Backport Providers 2020.11.13rc1. This email is >>>> calling a vote on the release, >>>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Thu, >>>> 12th of Nov 2020, 3 pm CET. >>>> >>>> Consider this my (binding) +1. >>>> >>>> Airflow Backport Providers 2020.11.13rc1 are available at: >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/backport-providers/2020.11.13rc1/ >>>> >>>> *apache-airflow-backport-providers-2020.11.13rc1-source.tar.gz* is a >>>> source release that comes >>>> with INSTALL instructions. >>>> >>>> *apache-airflow-backport-providers-<PROVIDER>-2020.11.13rc1-bin.tar.gz* >>>> are the binary >>>> Python "sdist" release. >>>> >>>> The test procedure for PMCs and Contributors who would like to test the >>>> RC candidates are described in >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/dev/README.md#vote-and-verify-the-backport-providers-release-candidate >>>> >>>> >>>> Public keys are available at: >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS >>>> >>>> Please vote accordingly: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >>>> >>>> >>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community >>>> are >>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". >>>> >>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string, so it's >>>> now >>>> simply 2020.11.13. This will allow us to rename the artifact without >>>> modifying >>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release. >>>> >>>> Each of the packages contains detailed changelog. Here is the list of >>>> links to >>>> the released packages and changelogs: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-backport-providers-elasticsearch/2020.11.13rc1/ >>>> >>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-backport-providers-google/2020.11.13rc1/ >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Jarek >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Jarek Potiuk >>>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer >>>> >>>> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> >>>> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Jarek Potiuk >>>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer >>>> >>>> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> >>>> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Jarek Potiuk >>>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer >>>> >>>> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> >>>> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Jarek Potiuk >>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer >>> >>> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> >>> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> Jarek Potiuk >> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer >> >> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> >> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> >> >> > > -- > > Jarek Potiuk > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > >
