One more to go!

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:05 AM Kamil Breguła <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020, 19:13 Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Still looking for those +1s
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:38 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just two providers to check this time:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-backport-providers-elasticsearch/2020.11.13rc1/
>>>
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-backport-providers-google/2020.11.13rc1/
>>>
>>> J.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:20 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Need two more +1s :)
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:02 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sounds good to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't tested any other providers yet, but consider by -0 vote
>>>>> retracted.
>>>>>
>>>>> -ash
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 9 2020, at 4:00 pm, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Cool. happy to release backports for those packages after current
>>>>> voting ends.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's now rather easy and takes very little time to prepare it and we
>>>>> got into the "release as needed"  schedule.
>>>>>
>>>>> J.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:30 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> PR to fix it https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12200
>>>>> -ash
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 9 2020, at 2:56 pm, Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Mostly -- the batch_waiters.json for Amazon was the one that wasn't.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 9 2020, at 2:50 pm, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed. Those were mostly examples, but it's good to have them :D.
>>>>> Thanks for catching this!
>>>>>
>>>>> J.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:40 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> -0 -- it turns out that we are missing data files in the packages!
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12197
>>>>> (-0 but not blocking, as this has probably been the case for a all
>>>>> previous backport providers we have released.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix coming soon anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> -ash
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 9 2020, at 2:12 pm, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have cut Airflow Backport Providers 2020.11.13rc1. This email is
>>>>> calling a vote on the release,
>>>>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Thu,
>>>>> 12th of Nov 2020, 3 pm CET.
>>>>>
>>>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Airflow Backport Providers 2020.11.13rc1 are available at:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/backport-providers/2020.11.13rc1/
>>>>>
>>>>> *apache-airflow-backport-providers-2020.11.13rc1-source.tar.gz* is a
>>>>> source release that comes
>>>>>  with INSTALL instructions.
>>>>>
>>>>> *apache-airflow-backport-providers-<PROVIDER>-2020.11.13rc1-bin.tar.gz*
>>>>> are the binary
>>>>>  Python "sdist" release.
>>>>>
>>>>> The test procedure for PMCs and Contributors who would like to test
>>>>> the RC candidates are described in
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/dev/README.md#vote-and-verify-the-backport-providers-release-candidate
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Public keys are available at:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
>>>>> are
>>>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string, so it's
>>>>> now
>>>>> simply 2020.11.13. This will allow us to rename the artifact without
>>>>> modifying
>>>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Each of the packages contains detailed changelog. Here is the list of
>>>>> links to
>>>>> the released packages and changelogs:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-backport-providers-elasticsearch/2020.11.13rc1/
>>>>>
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-backport-providers-google/2020.11.13rc1/
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Jarek
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Jarek Potiuk
>>>>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>>>>>
>>>>> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>>>>> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Jarek Potiuk
>>>>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>>>>>
>>>>> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>>>>> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Jarek Potiuk
>>>>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>>>>>
>>>>> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>>>>> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Jarek Potiuk
>>>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>>>>
>>>> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>>>> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Jarek Potiuk
>>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>>>
>>> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>>> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Jarek Potiuk
>> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>>
>> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>>
>>

-- 

Jarek Potiuk
Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer

M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
[image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>

Reply via email to