For whatever reason there was an ".invalid" added to your address in reply,
so let me just resend it :)

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:28 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:

> Great description. I have not had time to read it in detail - (added to
> weekend reading list :) ). But it looks great and it's clear you put
> enormous effort into that. The technology stack choice, tooling, test
> support, architecture all look very sound in the proposal at the first
> glance.
>
> Just a personal comment - It's a pity I will not have a lot of time to
> contribute to it :(. React has gone a long way and matured a lot since we
> pioneered it in Polidea (we were rather deeply vested in React Native for
> mobile Apps). You can see my talk from 2015 at Mobile Warsaw from early
> days of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3dz3OF81EE - it was already
> good then, but it is a fully matured ecosystem now, and a great choice as a
> technology.
>
> Great piece of AIP Ryan and Brent.
>
> This will be a huge effort to complete, but I am 100% sure it's worth it.
>
> J.
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:02 PM Ryan Hamilton
> <ryan.hamil...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Team,
>>
>> We just created “AIP-38 Modern Web Application”' on Confluence and would
>> very much appreciate feedback and suggestions from the community.
>>
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-38+Modern+Web+Application
>>
>> Building on the momentum of the release of 2.0 and the interest generated
>> by the UI refresh delivered by it, we feel the time is right to begin the
>> journey in making (and keeping) Airflow’s web application a truly modern
>> one. We outline our motivations in detail within the AIP, but ultimately we
>> strive to deliver a world-class user experience that strengthens Airflow’s
>> position as the leader for data orchestration.
>>
>> The AIP consists of two primary sections: Technology and Information
>> Architecture & Design. While the former has a fairly straightforward
>> specification of technology and a proof of concept, the latter may feel a
>> bit unorthodox as far as Airflow AIPs go. We are confident that the process
>> that we’ve proposed to support it will fully utilize the best design
>> practices that will yield an evolved and elevated experience for Airflow’s
>> users.
>>
>> We’re cognizant of the significant amount of effort that this endeavour
>> will require, and the ultimate impact that it will have on the future of
>> Airflow. We believe that the proposed community-supported design process,
>> and the introduction path with continual feedback loops will ensure that
>> the end result fully delivers on the needs of Airflow’s diverse community
>> of users.
>>
>> Any feedback, suggestions, and comments would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ryan Hamilton and Brent Bovenzi
>>
>>
>
> --
> +48 660 796 129
>


-- 
+48 660 796 129

Reply via email to