At first glance to someone who hasn't touched front end in years, this
looks so thoughtful and detailed! And it looks pretty when I tried it out
:)

One concern I have though is ensuring that accessibility is incorporated as
part of such a plan as well - I ran the lighthouse accessibility report
<https://developers.google.com/web/tools/lighthouse> on the demo site and
it got a 79/100, which is not bad, but it would be great to see that check
and its equivalent in other browsers be 100%. If others in the community
have other accessibility checkers they use as well, please send them along
because I'm by no means an expert! :)

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 12:20 PM Xinbin Huang <bin.huan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am already loving this UI! The change from the dropdown list to
> switching tabs makes it a lot more natural to lookup information in the UI.
>
> Thanks for the amazing work! Ryan and Brent.
>
> Best
> Bin
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 8:40 AM Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> I love the breadth of your thinking through the problem and the
>> incremental approach which can be adapted based on feedback.
>>
>> Ryan and Brent, excellent work on this and really looking forward to
>> seeing this happen!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Vikram
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 4:31 AM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is awesome. I can already see Airflow users loving this UI.
>>>
>>> The Proposed Process in the AIP looks sound too.
>>>
>>> I have cross-posed this email to #sig-ui channel on Airflow Slack
>>> workspace too:
>>> https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/CMLE0UZEG/p1614255950000300
>>>
>>> Well done -- Ryan and Brent.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kaxil
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:21 AM Sumit Maheshwari <
>>> sumeet.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wow, the new demo UI is super slick and awesome. Great work Ryan and
>>>> Brent.  👏
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 2:59 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> For whatever reason there was an ".invalid" added to your address in
>>>>> reply, so let me just resend it :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:28 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Great description. I have not had time to read it in detail - (added
>>>>>> to weekend reading list :) ). But it looks great and it's clear you put
>>>>>> enormous effort into that. The technology stack choice, tooling, test
>>>>>> support, architecture all look very sound in the proposal at the first
>>>>>> glance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just a personal comment - It's a pity I will not have a lot of time
>>>>>> to contribute to it :(. React has gone a long way and matured a lot since
>>>>>> we pioneered it in Polidea (we were rather deeply vested in React Native
>>>>>> for mobile Apps). You can see my talk from 2015 at Mobile Warsaw from 
>>>>>> early
>>>>>> days of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3dz3OF81EE - it was
>>>>>> already good then, but it is a fully matured ecosystem now, and a great
>>>>>> choice as a technology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Great piece of AIP Ryan and Brent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This will be a huge effort to complete, but I am 100% sure it's worth
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:02 PM Ryan Hamilton
>>>>>> <ryan.hamil...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Team,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We just created “AIP-38 Modern Web Application”' on Confluence and
>>>>>>> would very much appreciate feedback and suggestions from the
>>>>>>> community.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-38+Modern+Web+Application
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Building on the momentum of the release of 2.0 and the interest
>>>>>>> generated by the UI refresh delivered by it, we feel the time is right 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> begin the journey in making (and keeping) Airflow’s web application a 
>>>>>>> truly
>>>>>>> modern one. We outline our motivations in detail within the AIP, but
>>>>>>> ultimately we strive to deliver a world-class user experience that
>>>>>>> strengthens Airflow’s position as the leader for data orchestration.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The AIP consists of two primary sections: Technology and Information
>>>>>>> Architecture & Design. While the former has a fairly
>>>>>>> straightforward specification of technology and a proof of concept, the
>>>>>>> latter may feel a bit unorthodox as far as Airflow AIPs go. We are
>>>>>>> confident that the process that we’ve proposed to support it will fully
>>>>>>> utilize the best design practices that will yield an evolved and 
>>>>>>> elevated
>>>>>>> experience for Airflow’s users.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We’re cognizant of the significant amount of effort that this
>>>>>>> endeavour will require, and the ultimate impact that it will have on the
>>>>>>> future of Airflow. We believe that the proposed community-supported 
>>>>>>> design
>>>>>>> process, and the introduction path with continual feedback loops will
>>>>>>> ensure that the end result fully delivers on the needs of Airflow’s 
>>>>>>> diverse
>>>>>>> community of users.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any feedback, suggestions, and comments would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ryan Hamilton and Brent Bovenzi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> +48 660 796 129 <+48%20660%20796%20129>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> +48 660 796 129 <+48%20660%20796%20129>
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 

Leah Cole (she/her) | Developer Programs Engineer | colel...@google.com | (925)
257-2112
*I'm working weird hours during this pandemic and am sometimes a bit slower
to respond to PRs/CLs than normal. Please feel free to send me a gentle
ping for a status update if my slowness is blocking you and I'll do my best
to give you an ETA. *

Reply via email to